June CCSS K-12 Infomation


Race to the Top Assessments and Assessment Consortium Information and News can be found on the Tests, Testing, and Test Issues
page



June CCSS K-12 Information, Reviews, Comparisons, Issues, etc.




The State of State Standards--and the Common Core--in 2010
July 21, 2010by Sheila Byrd Carmichael, Gabrielle Martino, Kathleen Porter-Magee, W. Stephen Wilson Fordham Institute

BJB comments on selected state standards and their draft Fordham SOSS 2010 reviews
Bas Braams Vienna, 08 July 2010
Near the end of the process the Fordham editors of the State Of State Standards (SOSS) 2010 asked me to review the proposed grades for some of the State mathematics standards, as a check for them before they went public. I reviewed their draft reviews and grades of themathematics standards of Vermont, Wisconsin, Maryland, Ohio, New Mexico and (only briefly) the Common Core. My evaluation supported the draft of SOSS; I think they gave correct grades. Anyone who cares for the details of my evaluation of the draft of SOSS for the mentioned
states can find it here. a note from Bas Braams



California State Academic Content Standards Commission website



Comments on the Common Core Standards for Math U.S. Coalition for World Class Math


Wurman-Evers Cascading Plan for a Common Core Pathway to Algebra in 8th Grade
7.10.10 - Ze'ev Wurman & Bill Evers EducationNews.org


A comparison of proposed US Common Core math standard to standards of selected Asian countries.
Jonathan Goodman 09/07/2010 EducationNews.org

How Good are the Common Core math Standards?
Presentation to PACE, Sacramento
June 10, 2010 H. Wu

The Dreaded Standards
Siegfried Engelmann June 7, 2010 Zig Engelmann and Direct Instruction






From the Common Core State Standards Website

Representations, Warranties and Disclaimer:

THE COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS ARE PROVIDED AS-IS AND WITH ALL FAULTS, AND NGA CENTER/CCSSO MAKE NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS, IMPLIED, STATUTORY OR OTHERWISE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, WARRANTIES OF TITLE, MERCHANTIBILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, NONINFRINGEMENT, ACCURACY, OR THE PRESENCE OR ABSENCE OF ERRORS, WHETHER OR NOT DISCOVERABLE.

Limitation on Liability:

UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL NGA CENTER OR CCSSO, INDIVIDUALLY OR JOINTLY, BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR PUNITIVE DAMAGES HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY LEGAL THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER FOR CONTRACT, TORT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR A COMBINATION THEREOF (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THE COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH RISK AND POTENTIAL DAMAGE. WITHOUT LIMITING THE FOREGOING, LICENSEE WAIVES THE RIGHT TO SEEK LEGAL REDRESS AGAINST, AND RELEASES FROM ALL LIABILITY AND COVENANTS NOT TO SUE, NGA CENTER AND CCSSO.